Compare the cultural revolution called for in the Futurist Manifesto Essay

Comp be the cultural rotation called for in the Futurist Manifesto with the political revolution of the envision of Potosi - Essay ExampleThe Plan of San Luis Potosi, on the other hand, is a statement made by Francisco Madero, a leader of the political opposition in Mexico when the country was under the grip of a dictator, Porfirio Diaz. In the statement, Madero explicitly discourseed the necessity of a revolution that would oust the dictator and establish a truly pop government. Although both authors apparently wrote their respective pieces to promote revolutions, they do have signifi dirty dogt differences in terms amicable analysis, objectives, methods, and perspectives. The fact that one is essentially cultural, while the other is political, is already a major factor in the difference between the two. Before Marinetti explained the concepts he is promoting in the Manifesto, he made an effort to first express his sentiments regarding the realities in Italian society then. It is apparent that he had nothing but harsh criticisms for the peoples continuing reverence of items of antiquity. He believes that people should no longer adulate anything that is a remnant of a bygone era because this only tends to obstruct the rapid pace of development. He writes what is the use of looking hind end at the moment when we must open the mysterious shutters of the impossible? (Marinetti) However, Marinetti clearly goes to the extreme, when he considers that humane concepts are also outmoded. Clearly, this cultural revolution that he proposes is radical in a sense that it essentially seeks the annihilation of what has been considered characteristically human compassion. In place of love and compassion, which Marinetti believes are traits that can only be attributed to the weaknesses of humans, are hatred and violence. In explaining his agenda, Marinetti points out that all things that symbolize so-called glories of the past, including cemeteries and museums, should be destroyed so that futurism can be advanced. He asserts that daily visits to museums, libraries and academies (those cemeteries of wasted effort, calvaries of crucified dreams, registers of false starts) is for artists what prolonged supervision by the parents is for intelligent untested men, drunk with their own talent and ambition. (Marinetti) In order to achieve what he envisions, Marinetti endorses the use of violence or war. For him, total destruction of the old through the use of violent force is the prerequisite to the realization of futurism. Madero, on the other hand, puts forward the idea of launching a political revolution against the Diaz dictatorship in his country, Mexico. Madero expounds the bases of the revolution in the article Plan of San Luis Potosi. The Mexican people have suffered much under the undemocratic see of the current regime. Their basic civil and political rights have been violated many times, the most glaring ensample of which is the anomalous elec tion results that led to the failed attempt of Madero to take the presidency. Madero denounces the Diaz promise of achieving pacification without democracy. He writes that it is a peace full of shame for the Mexican nation, because its basis is not law, but force because its object is not the lift and prosperity of the country, but to enrich a small group who, abusing their influence, have converted the public charges into fountains of all personal benefit, unscrupulously